Share:
Table of contents
Subscribe to the newsletter
See how Priority works for you
An ERP RFP, or enterprise resource planning request for proposal, is a formal document issued by organizations to software vendors requesting detailed proposals for a specified ERP project.
Unlike an RFI (Request for Information), which is exploratory, the RFP is directive, defining what your organization needs, both functionally and technically, and soliciting structured responses for how vendors intend to meet those needs.
The RFP expresses requirements, constraints, success metrics, deployment expectations, integration needs, budgetary parameters, and more, to form the basis for vendor evaluation, internal budgeting, and execution planning.
This reference guide will help you and your team plan for success.
The RFP provides a consistent framework for evaluating vendors on equal footing- based on operational fit.
Instead of relying on anecdotal impressions or varied proposal formats, you’re asking all vendors to respond to the same requirements in the same structure, with the same level of detail.
That allows for direct, “apples to apples” comparison- reducing selection bias, and ensures that each vendor responds to the same set of requirements, facilitating objective evaluation based on documented metrics (technical fit, pricing, implementation timelines, and scalability) and use-case alignment.
Most ERP failures don’t come from technology, instead they come from mismatched expectations.
A well-written RFP minimizes the chance for mismatched expectations by forcing you to define the project scope, success metrics, system constraints, and stakeholder expectations up front.
Internally this ensures alignment among your stakeholders, and externally, gives vendors the information they need to propose the best fitting solution while reducing the likelihood of scope creep, change orders, or post-contract disputes during implementation.
Drafting an ERP RFP requires in-house stakeholders (finance, operations, supply chain, HR, etc.) to identify and document functional, operational, and technical requirements across departments and expose gaps in current workflows, integration points with legacy systems, and compliance requirements that aren’t always documented elsewhere.
That discovery work is often more valuable than the RFP itself.
An effective ERP RFP defines cost parameters, expected timelines, key deliverables, and resource allocation.
Vendors must respond with pricing structures based on detailed scope components, including licensing models, customization costs, implementation services, support, and training.
This allows organizations to establish a realistic ERP budget and align internal resource planning with vendor delivery timelines.
The executive summary outlines the context, purpose, and high-level expectations of the ERP initiative – This is where you frame the purpose and scope of the RFP in business terms. It’s not necessarily a technical section, but a high-level statement of intent.
It should answer questions like :
The summary gives vendors immediate context and sets the tone internally for stakeholders who may not read the full document.
This section gives vendors the operational context they need. It provides relevant organizational data on the size of the organization, number of employees, global footprint, number of business units, current tech stack and more. These details influence everything from licensing models to deployment architecture.
Clearly define operational, strategic, and technical goals tied to the ERP project. In other words – You need to define what success looks like, not just for IT, but for the business.
Are you aiming for faster financial closes? Better inventory accuracy? Real-time reporting?
Set measurable KPIs like process automation rates, cost reductions, improved reporting accuracy, or operational uptime targets. This will later guide implementation priorities and post-go-live evaluations.
The RFP must cover functional requirements – by module or business process area (finance, procurement, production, inventory, HR, CRM), and technical expectations like architecture, performance benchmarks, security protocols, data structures, and scalability.
You should categorize requirements as “must-have,” “nice-to-have,” or “optional,” and give vendors a structured way to respond (e.g., supported out of the box, requires customization, not supported).
Specify preferred deployment architecture and required hosting models, such as single-tenant cloud, multi-tenant SaaS, or private data center. Clarify compliance, latency, or security constraints that affect the deployment model. Vendors should demonstrate alignment with infrastructure policies and provide architecture diagrams when applicable.
List third-party systems that require interoperability with the ERP platform, including customer relationship management, supply chain management, human resource information systems, and other industry-specific tools. Provide interface specifications, data exchange formats, and frequency of synchronization. Vendors should detail middleware strategies or pre-built connectors where relevant.
Define your target go-live date, any immovable deadlines (such as fiscal year start, divestiture close, or regulatory compliance dates), key phase milestones (requirements validation, configuration, testing, UAT, and training), and internal resource availability (and blackout periods)- Vendors must map their implementation methodology to the timeline and identify any resource or scheduling conflicts.
Specify post go-live support expectations- knowledge transfer requirements, documentation deliverables, and training modalities – specify whether you prefer onsite sessions, remote training, or a train-the-trainer model.
Define expected SLAs, support hours, escalation procedures, ticket resolution times, version upgrades, and access to knowledge bases.
Include documentation expectations. These factors often fall to the bottom of the priority list but are essential for long-term system adoption.
Clarify what data needs to be migrated, master data, historical transactions, compliance archives, and from which systems.
Provide volume estimates and data quality considerations if available. Outline your expectations around access control, audit logging, encryption, backup, and compliance frameworks (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001). This allows vendors to propose migration strategies and confirm certifications.
Communicate the criteria (quantitative and qualitative) that will be used to evaluate the proposals.
Define weighted scoring categories such as functionality, implementation approach, pricing, vendor experience, support, risk mitigation, etc. Provide clear principles so vendors can prioritize their responses accordingly.
This will accelerate internal decision-making and eliminate subjective debates during the final stages.
You’re not expected to share your full budget, but you do need to define a pricing format. Ask for breakdowns by module, user type, implementation services, integrations, training, support, and annual maintenance.
Indicate if you prefer subscription vs. perpetual licensing. This enables consistent comparison and surfaces hidden costs early. Also, state any budget constraints or procurement policies that vendors should be aware of.
Include questions about company history, financial stability, customer base, vertical specialization, certifications, and delivery capacity.
Require detailed information about team structure, key personnel, subcontractors, and prior experience with similar ERP implementations. This supports risk mitigation and vendor due diligence.
This section filters out vendors who lack experience or capacity. Ask for proof of financial stability, information about customer base in your industry, relevant certifications, implementation track record, and references. Request bios of key personnel, project methodologies, and support structures to assess delivery risk.
Finish with a clear and precise administrative section that defines the response format (Word, Excel, PDF), submission methods, deadlines, and points of contact and clarifies expectations around bidder Q&A, live demos, or shortlist interviews.
Schedule a no-obligation call with one of our experts to get expert advice on how Priority can help streamline your operations.
First, be as clear and literal as possible. Avoid subjective or ambiguous phrasing. For example, “user-friendly interface” or “robust reporting” means different things to different vendors.
Instead, specify what you want to achieve such as “role-based dashboards with drill-down from GL to transaction level” or “ability to configure approval workflows by cost center.” Vendors can’t respond accurately if the requirement is vague, and you can’t hold them accountable later. Plain, direct language reduces misinterpretation.
The RFP must reflect the real needs and constraints of all business units impacted by the ERP system implementation- critical requirements will probably be missed if relevant stakeholders aren’t involved in the drafting process. Worse, you’ll end up with low adoption rate post-implementation because the system won’t reflect real operational needs.
Involve department heads early- conduct structured interviews or workshops to both gather an accurate requirements overview and build internal ownership of the project.
Do not allow vendors to submit freeform proposals- otherwise, you’ll receive different formats, different pricing models, and different interpretations of your requirements, making a side-by-side comparison nearly impossible.
The solution is to define standardized response templates such as requirement matrices, pricing tables, implementation schedules, and support SLAs. Ask vendors to respond using your format to save significant time during evaluation and make gaps and trade-offs much easier to identify.
Expect that no matter how well your RFP is written, vendors will ask for clarification. Build in a formal Q&A window before the submission deadline. Use a shared clarification log so all vendors receive the same information at the same time.
And be proactive, review your RFP with internal teams and identify likely areas of confusion before vendors raise them. If you wait until after submission to address these, you’ll end up extending timelines or reviewing proposals that are misaligned with your intent.
The single most common issue in ERP RFPs is a lack of specificity. Requirements like “streamline operations,” “improve reporting,” or “enhance user experience” are too broad to act on.
If vendors don’t know what you mean by success, they’ll make assumptions and those assumptions will differ across proposals.
What’s needed is process-level clarity. For example, define the cycle time you’re aiming to reduce, the reports you need automated, or the compliance rules you must meet.
Every vague requirement introduces variability, which becomes a risk factor during implementation and contract negotiation.
Setting arbitrary or overly aggressive go-live dates without internal validation is another recurring mistake.
ERP implementation is resource-intensive. It requires process redesign, data migration, testing, change management, and training, none of which can be compressed indefinitely.
If the timeline is dictated by external deadlines or calendar targets without accounting for internal readiness, vendors will either decline to bid or submit padded proposals with higher risk contingencies.
A realistic timeline should be based on your organization’s availability, decision-making speed, and complexity, not a fiscal target or executive preference.
Evaluation without structure leads to inconsistent scoring and stakeholder disagreement.
If you haven’t documented how proposals will be assessed and weighted accordingly you’re likely to base decisions on presentation quality or perceived vendor reputation. That creates room for bias and undermines your ability to justify the final selection.
Define your scoring model upfront. Prioritize business alignment, implementation methodology, functional fit, and long-term support over superficial differentiators.
This also signals to vendors what they should focus on and improves the quality of their submissions.
Most organizations rely on external platforms for CRM, HR, logistics, eCommerce, and analytics. If those systems are not accounted for in the RFP, integration complexity becomes visible too late, usually during implementation.
Similarly, underestimating the effort required for data migration leads to missed deadlines and poor data quality at go-live. You need to define interface requirements and clarify data ownership and cleansing responsibilities before vendor selection begins.
To conclude, a well-executed ERP RFP needs to be addressed as an operations tool for aligning your organization’s priorities, establishing control over scope and cost, and setting the foundation for a successful implementation.
It forces clarity where ambiguity typically derails projects. It exposes risks before contracts are signed and gives your internal teams and external partners a shared, structured framework to work on.
Investing the time to define requirements, involve stakeholders, standardize vendor responses, and avoid common missteps pays off not only during vendor selection but throughout the entire ERP lifecycle.
Treat the RFP as the first real deliverable of your ERP project and build it with the same precision and accountability you expect from the system itself.
Automation is rapidly becoming one of the fastest-growing trends in warehouse management as the industry faces mounting pressures to improve operational efficiency,
ERP software is a business management tool that helps companies automate, manage, and monitor various business processes.
To access the file, please complete the form below.
